A Million Bucks In Scholarships ? That?s Not Me Kidding around!

Surety securities are not a great investment connect, somewhat they’re a 3 get together (principal, obligee, and certainty) assure. We are going to readily illustration (using mortgage brokers) to make it easier to be aware of. Their state (obligee) the large financial company is functioning in necessitates that a certainty connect be recorded so that [...]

The post A Million Bucks In Scholarships – That’s Not Me Kidding around! appeared first on legal debt help online.

Source: http://www.legaldebthelponline.com/2012/06/26/a-million-bucks-in-scholarships-thats-not-me-kidding-around/

ways to get out of debt american credit card debt american debt relief american debt settlement

How Dow Chemical Can End the Bhopal Tragedy

Editor's note: This article has been corrected to reflect that the Bhopal company was majority-owned, not wholly owned, by Union Carbide.

Early in the morning on Dec. 3, 1984, a leaking tank within an insecticide plant unleashed approximately 45 tons of a toxic gas in the northern area of Bhopal, a city in central India. The poisonous gas cloud -- a methyl isocyanate compound -- spread across the surrounding neighborhoods and slums as the people of Bhopal slept. Direct exposure to the substance reportedly killed 3,800 people during the night, while thousands of others fled the city and the expanding cloud of toxic fumes.

Almost three decades later, the gas has vanished, but Bhopal remains devastated by the toxic leak. The company responsible for the disaster was a majority-owned subsidiary of Union Carbide, which itself is now a subsidiary of Dow Chemical. The story of Bhopal has been unearthed because of Dow's prominent role as a key sponsor in the 2012 Summer Olympics.

A controversial Summer Games
London's 2012 Summer Olympics were supposed to be the "first truly sustainable Olympic Games," according to organizers. Contrasting with Beijing's over-the-top production, London aimed to leave a legacy of environmental responsibility. Dow's sponsorship (to say nothing of co-sponsors BP and Rio Tinto) has put that legacy in serious jeopardy. The relationship between Dow, Bhopal, and Olympic sustainability triggered protests and anti-greenwashing campaigns, while provoking outcries against globalization. We believe the story of Bhopal and Dow should be shared with investors to encourage corporate transparency around the world.

We also believe Dow can reverse this public relations nightmare by taking responsibility for Bhopal on the global stage of the Olympics. As outlined below, we propose a very clear, simple, and fair solution. We strongly encourage readers to share this article to bring further attention to an important issue. We recommend financing a Bhopal remediation effort through a public stock offering, a move that would boost Dow Chemical's reputation and, most importantly, provide the people of Bhopal with the services and health care they desperately need.

The disaster and the devastation that followed
For Americans, the disastrous gas leak is a distant memory, but the aftermath burdens the daily lives of Bhopal citizens even today. While figures vary widely, several accounts estimate the disaster ultimately led to 20,000 deaths, and a 2006 Indian government affidavit stated that the leak caused 558,125 injuries. Those numbers continue to grow because of the hazardous waste that remains at the crumbling insecticide plant. The city has become a symbol of broken governance, legal maneuvering, and extreme human suffering.

Originally, Union Carbide claimed the gas leak was a result of sabotage. However, plaintiffs in a 1998 civil suit in India revealed a laundry list of safety issues that were contributing factors to the catastrophe. Among these were poor maintenance, failure to implement safety precautions, and evidence that cost-cutting measures increased the severity of the disaster. Reports have noted that the safety equipment and procedures in place in Bhopal were seriously lacking compared to those of similar U.S.-based plants.

Following the disaster, Union Carbide failed to appear in court for trial in India, and eventually reached a settlement, agreeing to pay $470 million in 1989, which amounted to $1,500 per death and $550 per contaminated individual. The figure was substantially reduced from the $3.3 billion original claim presented by the Indian government and seems drastically low given the lingering adverse health effects of the gas leak. Unusually high instances of cancer, respiratory difficulties, immune and neurological disorders, near-blindness, reproductive difficulties, and heart problems continue to afflict the survivors. Bhopal's miscarriage rate is now seven times the average in India . Moreover, no one under the age of 18 was registered as a victim during the aftermath, yet the number of children exposed to the gas is estimated to be over 200,000.

Adding insult to injury, some 425 tons of hazardous waste remain on the grounds of the old factory today. Little has been done to clean up or remove the various chemicals, which continue to seep into the ground and pollute the local drinking water. The Indian government ships fresh water, but the deliveries are highly irregular. As a result, slum-dwellers are left with no choice but to drink the tainted groundwater.

To make matters worse, the slums expanded around the site because of the relatively low cost of nearby land. The inhabitants, already crippled by extreme poverty, develop chronic and debilitating illnesses that burden their everyday lives. Their ability to work is diminished. Children raised in this area face twice the risk of dying as do children elsewhere, partly because their parents cannot care for them adequately. Surprisingly enough, despite the serious health problems reported over the years, Union Carbide once claimed that methyl isocyanate was only a "mild throat and ear irritant."

Legal wrangling, scapegoating, and corruption have let persist an environmental cesspool that is destroying human life. Had Union Carbide or the government cleaned up the waste and provided an adequate water supply, as originally intended, countless birth defects and premature deaths could have been avoided.

Only recently has the Madhya Pradesh state government taken steps to address the crumbling factory site, which The New York Times described as a "wasteland in the city's heart." A German agency has agreed to remove 350 tons of waste over the course of the next year, all at Indian taxpayers' expense. While the local government had previously impeded studies on Bhopal's environmental contamination, the Madhya Pradesh government's willingness to let the German agency remove the waste is a hopeful sign. Still, the epic mess that began over a quarter-century ago is far from over. Who can -- and should -- help the remaining victims and put an end to the ordeal once and for all?

Why Dow should assume responsibility
For nearly three decades, the companies involved and the Indian government repeatedly deflected responsibility for the Bhopal disaster. The plant's operator at the time of the leak, Union Carbide India Limited, was spun-off from the Union Carbide Corporation after the disaster, but by then the plant had closed permanently and the assets and liabilities were no longer on UCIL's books. After an extended round of the blame game, the responsibility for Bhopal fell into a black hole while Bhopali citizens continued to suffer.

We conducted a careful analysis and believe all roads lead to Dow when it comes to Bhopal's environmental liabilities. One by one, let's dissect and rebut Dow's arguments:

  • The Indian government should take responsibility for the Bhopal site.
    Both India and the U.S. adhere to the "polluter pays" principle, which states that the producer of pollution must pay for its consequences. Union Carbide was the polluter, and the continued existence of severe health problems and toxic waste in Bhopal shows that Union Carbide never fulfilled its responsibility. Further, Union Carbide signed a lease with the Indian government, promising to return the site "in its original condition." Even though the Indian government does in fact own the site now, Union Carbide failed to fulfill its original obligation.
  • If Union Carbide owned the Bhopal plant, Dow bears no responsibility.
    In 1984, Union Carbide owned the plant. A decade later, Union Carbide claimed that the plant was sold during an auction in 1994. However, contradictory to that claim, the plant was no longer on the books at the time of the auction. Instead, the Indian government had shut down the plant, and the legal ramifications of the pollution were still being resolved. In 2001, Dow acquired Union Carbide for $11.6 billion and the two entities became one and the same. So when we write "Dow," think "Union Carbide." Union Carbide describes the relationship in its annual report: "Union Carbide's business activities comprise components of Dow's global operations rather than stand-alone operations."
  • Dow bought Union Carbide free of liabilities.
    According to international law, the principal of "successor liability" requires the purchaser to gain both the assets and liabilities of the target. So, along with the wealth of assets acquired from Union Carbide, Dow should also be responsible for the environmental and health damage Union Carbide caused in Bhopal.
  • There is no precedent for Dow assuming Union Carbide's liabilities.
    A Dow spokesperson has pointed out that providing funds for Bhopal is out of the question since it would open up the company for additional liabilities. However, after purchasing Union Carbide in 2001, Dow acknowledged its responsibility for asbestos liabilities from American incidents involving Union Carbide dating back to 1972. In fact, Dow set aside $2.2 billion to resolve the asbestos issues. So Dow recognizes that "successor liability" applies, yet it ignores the inherited liabilities of the Bhopal disaster.
  • Union Carbide settled the claim years ago.
    The Indian government's $470 million settlement with Union Carbide represented 15% of the original $3.3 billion claim, and left victims with about $550. Dow Public Relations Officer Kathy Hun once asserted that "$500 is plenty good for an Indian." According to The Bhopal Reader, "It was widely believed that the courts had been pressured or influenced by the [Indian] Congress government ... and that the government had made a private deal with Union Carbide." To this day, Dow has continued to pressure the Indian government to keep the company free of liability, acknowledging that the debt is not fully paid and the criminal case not entirely resolved. In a 2006 letter to the Indian ambassador, Dow CEO Andrew Liveris sought assurance Dow had no further responsibility at Bhopal "to ensure that we have the appropriate investment climate."
  • Eveready Industries should be liable.
    While Eveready Industries did purchase Union Carbide India Limited, Union Carbide's Indian subsidiary, in 1994, the Bhopal plant had long been closed, so there was no transfer of the site and its liability to Eveready. Union Carbide owned and operated the Bhopal site, so Union Carbide (and now Dow) should be held liable according to the "polluter pays" principle.

A company should take responsibility for the environmental damage caused by its operations. Since Dow acquired Union Carbide outright in 2001, this responsibility should lie with Dow, but thus far the U.S. courts have disagreed. Untangling the legal liability is outside of our focus, however, and the mistakes by the Indian government only made the legal mess worse. Ultimately, Dow should remedy the situation for ethical reasons, and establish an entirely new precedent.

This type of convoluted legal maneuvering by Union Carbide and Dow is not a new story. In Ecuador, beginning in the 1960s, Texaco discharged billions of gallons of oil waste directly into the Amazon rainforest, creating an oil spill that ruined the lives of countless indigenous people. Chevron, after acquiring Texaco (and its liabilities!) in 2001, has refused to pay the $18 billion fine ordered by Ecuadorian courts, claiming fraud. In a company statement, Chevron argues that PetroEcuador, the state-owned oil company that took over Texaco's facilities after 2001, should be held responsible. Sound familiar?

As these cases illustrate, multinational companies can use legal loopholes to shirk their responsibilities in developing countries. Some of the world's richest companies profit at the expense of some of its poorest citizens. Meanwhile, shareholders in these companies often remain oblivious to the true nature of these transactions.

A solution to this continuing tragedy
Dow's management team, employees, and shareholders should capitalize on the unique opportunity the company has as a sponsor of the 2012 Olympic Games. While Dow has no legal obligation, Dow has an ethical obligation to right this wrong, a move that will end up benefiting Dow in the long run. Independent of the Indian government, Dow should create a Bhopal relief fund immediately to accomplish the following:

  • End unnecessary human suffering.
    Dow must take responsibility for the survivors' health and rehabilitation. While the Indian government has attempted to finance a health insurance policy for victims, the effort failed because of bureaucracy and corruption. Dow should buy a group insurance plan to ensure people receive the care they deserve, while adhering to the "polluter pays" principle.
  • Build health care facilities.
    Dow must provide ongoing access to treatment for the individuals affected by the Bhopal disaster. Allow organizations representing victims to participate and conduct research to better understand the afflicting illnesses.
  • Clean up the site.
    A thorough cleanup is of utmost priority to prevent further exposure to toxic soil and groundwater. Beyond removing the waste, cleanup will include decontaminating the soil and water to remove all traces of the toxic chemicals and will ensure that Dow's liability does not keep growing.

Estimating the cost of the above actions is difficult. At this point, only the Indian government has access to critical information about the site and victims, and its studies recently estimated that just over $1 billion would be an appropriate comprehensive total. We outline below how Dow could finance at least half this amount (perhaps much more) soon after the 2012 Olympic games:

1. Conduct a subsequent stock offering ($540 million investment)
Dow's board of directors should propose a 1.5% dilutive stock offering, which would result in 18 million new common shares. Such an offering would raise approximately $540 million at Dow's current share price of $30, all of which would be committed to the Bhopal Relief Fund.

Initially, shareholders might balk at the idea of diluting their claim on the company's earnings. The recommended sum, $540 million, may give investors sticker shock, but this isn't an unusual move for the $36 billion company. Just last year, Dow issued 9.2 million new shares, half the amount proposed here. Even if shares drop initially, Dow's support would help erase a liability that management has ignored for over a decade. We think the market could interpret Dow's approach positively, if the company communicates the proposal effectively.

At the Fool, we encourage buy-and-hold investing practices, and shareholders with a similar outlook would recognize the move as an intangible investment in Dow's reputation. Investors should urge Dow to rise above its legal maneuvering and make a long-term investment by aiding the victims of Bhopal.

2. Sponsor an Olympic fundraising campaign ($10 million investment)
In addition to the stock offering, Dow should raise funds through a widespread campaign announced during the Olympics. Thus far, Dow's Olympic sponsorship has resulted in utter outrage in London and India. A motion in March 2012 to terminate Dow Chemical's Olympic sponsorship was only narrowly rejected in an 11-10 vote by the organizing committee.

The backlash has yet to subside, but Dow could change public sentiment during the London Games. Dow should announce the launch of a $10 million campaign to raise awareness for the people of Bhopal, calling attention to its intent to remediate Bhopal during one of the most widely watched events in the world.

While it's impossible to estimate third-party donations resulting from such a campaign, the response could be significant. Dow's willingness to take action despite its lack of legal obligation would set an important precedent in corporate America.

Overall, Dow's contribution would go a long way in addressing its liability to Bhopal inherited from Union Carbide. Dow would be committing more than half of the $1 billion requested by the Indian government. This is a fair and reasonable approach that would prevent Dow from paying for the government's inaction and missteps over the years. At the same time, this move would show that Dow has decided to rise above the legal mess, take responsibility for its subsidiary's negligence, and do what is ethically right.

Why now?
Dow's refusal to take responsibility for Bhopal has hit the company's bottom line well beyond the associated legal costs. The unaddressed liability has hurt its reputation, resulted in protests and media backlash, and even limited its ability to invest overseas. One activist organization went so far as to pose as a Dow spokesperson on the BBC, claiming responsibility for the Bhopal disaster, and consequently causing a sell-off in European markets that erased $2 billion worth of Dow's market cap (which was recovered when the hoax was revealed).

Despite Dow's disregard for Bhopal, the company's "human element" advertising campaign allegedly "showcases Dow's commitment to addressing global economic, social and environmental concerns." Now is the time for Dow to embody this uplifting message it has paid millions to publicize. By taking action for Bhopal, Dow has an opportunity to rebuild its brand and become the paradigm for corporate social responsibility.

Dow's employees, shareholders, and even the broader investing community have something at stake. Dow's reparations would pay back a debt to thousands of victims that had previously been excluded from its balance sheet, creating transparency in an opaque reporting environment. This approach should be championed across the business world.

We're forwarding this article and our proposal to Dow's 10 largest institutional investors. Alone, these 10 institutions hold 42% of the company, but there are millions of other shareholders. Every Dow investor should use his or her voice to support a resolution to help the people of Bhopal. There is no better time than now for Dow to live up to its advertising campaign and demonstrate the ideals of the Olympic Games.

How can you help? Our goal is to spread the word about a tragedy that many Americans had never heard of or scarcely remember. Share this article with friends and family, and tell them about the Bhopal tragedy. Also, contact the Dow Investor Relations Office at 1-800-422-8193 and voice your concerns about Dow's role as an Olympic sponsor.

In addition, you can learn more about Dow and the disaster through the following outlets:

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin Wordpress | Android Forums | Wordpress Tutorials

Source: http://feeds.fool.com/~r/usmf/foolwatch/~3/Stg2O96dUV4/story01.htm

credit debt elimination credit debt solutions debt advice uk debt advisor

Could This Woman Be On Mitt Romney's V.P. Shortlist?

pam bondi

As Mitt Romney draws closer to a decision about his 2012 running mate, speculation about who the Republican presidential candidate will select to be his No. 2 has reached a fever pitch. 

Romney is expected to make the announcement sometime after he returns from overseas next week. In the meantime, his campaign has launched a major surrogate blitz, dispatching seven of the most buzzed-about VP contenders to rally Romney supporters in swing states. 

But this afternoon, the campaign added a surprise name to the list: Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.

According to a campaign release, Bondi will travel miles away from her home state on Saturday to stump for Romney at three stops in New Hampshire, including a Women for Mitt Kickoff Breakfast in Concord, and campaign office openings in Bedford and Stratham. 

Incidentally, the events will put Bondi in close proximity to both the Romney campaign headquarters in Boston and the Romney family's vacation compound on New Hampshire's Lake Winnepesaukee.

Conventional wisdom would suggest that Bondi is not high on Romney's VP list. The specter of Sarah Palin still looms large over the Republican Party, and Bondi, with her unknown background and all-American sorority-girl looks would undoubtedly spur Palin comparisons and a 2008-style media feeding frenzy. 

But there are actually some compelling reasons why Romney might be considering Bondi for his No. 2 spot. And given that everything anyone writes about the VP process so far is only speculation, we might as well have some fun.  

Here's why Bondi might be on Romney's shortlist: 

  • She's a woman. And she's young. While the Romney campaign is said to be looking for experience and gravitas, there are obvious demographic advantages to picking someone who can appeal to women and young people.
  • She's from Florida. Bondi could give Romney a much-needed advantage in the crucial swing state. 
  • She tried to take down Obamacare — and almost won. Bondi was the lead attorney general in the lawsuit to overturn the Affordable Care Act. With her as VP, Romney would have one less problem to deal with. 
  • She's really pretty. 

She also seems to have a good rapport with the candidate. Here's a picture of Bondi and Mitt hanging out with Lenny Kravitz at the Daytona 500 that she posted on her Facebook page

pam bondi mitt romney lenny kravitz

But Bondi also comes with some political baggage, not least of which is her complicated marital past. Bondi is twice married and divorced, and earlier this year postponed her wedding to her current fiancé under strange circumstances. According to the Miami Herald, Bondi had planned a destination wedding in the Cayman Islands this May, but unexpectedly cancelled the nuptials at the very last minute. The very last minute. Here's an excerpt from the Herald story: 

In November, she told the Tampa Bay Times that she was hoping for a spring affair. Political insiders eventually caught wind that a destination wedding was planned for Memorial Day weekend, but details were limited and the guest list was exclusive….

Even some of the guests invited to join the couple in Cayman didn’t know about the change in plans as they embarked for the Caribbean. Former Tampa Mayor Dick Greco said he isn’t sure when he learned there wouldn’t be a wedding, perhaps on the plane ride there.

"Some knew, and some didn’t," said Greco, who traveled with his wife, Linda McClintock. "But everybody knew before Saturday."

There was still partying and even kind words for the bride and groom, but no formalities, Greco said. "They had a prayer and a couple of Bible scriptures and said that is what they had decided to do."

Here's a picture of Bondi serving her guests cocktails on the plane to Cayman, courtesy of Florida state Senator Paula Dockery's Facebook page: 

pam bondi cocktails

Bondi later told the Herald that she and her fiancé are still "happily in love." But obviously the last thing the Romney campaign needs is another Cayman Islands problem.

Even if Bondi doesn't make Romney's VP cut, it's safe to assume we'll be seeing a lot more of her on the campaign trail. The Florida Attorney General has been ramping up her national profile in recent weeks, joining a Republican National Committee effort to recruit more women to the party and defending Florida's controversial voter purge against Democratic criticism.

Plus, if the presidential race once again comes down to Florida, Romney will definitely want this woman in his corner. 

Please follow Politics on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/businessinsider/~3/KEuBulknV6g/romney-vp-pick-pam-bondi-florida-attorney-general-2012-7

student loan debt relief texas debt collection act uk government debt ways to get out of debt

ART CASHIN: We Are At Risk Of Hyperinflation

art cashin

Art Cashin, director of floor operations for UBS Financial Services, is sounding the alarm on hyperinflation.

"There is plenty of money around but it’s not finding its way into the system," said Cashin in an interview with King World News.

Here's more:

By standards, the amount of liquidity that’s around the globe should be hyperinflationary.  It is not.  It is because when Bernanke flies over your house and drops millions of dollars in fresh cash on your lawn, you are so terrified you pick it up and store it in the garage.  They’ve got to find a way to unlock all of that liquidity in the garages around the globe.

This is a very, very different time than virtually anything we’ve seen before.

Read more at KingWorldNews.com.

SEE ALSO: The Best Advice From The Most Brilliant Investors In The World >

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/businessinsider/~3/I_hE0eGvL3Q/art-cashin-hyperinflation-2012-7

debt definition debt dispute letter debt elimination calculator debt elimination programs

The Biggest Fanboy In Silicon Valley Just Paid $20K For Lunch With Joss Whedon

Brooke Hammerling and Joss Whedon

Someone in Silicon Valley has a lot of money and is a secret fan of Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Or maybe Firefly.

We can't provide his name, but at a charity event for African nonprofit ThriveGulu Thursday night, PR maven Brooke Hammerling submitted a winning bid of $20,000 for lunch with famed screenwriter and producer Joss Whedon.

Whedon is known for writing the Buffy and Dollhouse TV series. He also directed and wrote the screenplay for this year's hit movie The Avengers.

Hammerling told Business Insider that she made the bid on behalf of an anonymous donor. (Proceeds went to ThriveGulu.) But she wouldn't name Whedon's new lunch buddy.

So let's run through the likely candidates.

Hammerling's firm, Brew PR, reps Automattic, the maker of WordPress, and NetSuite, an enterprise software-as-a-service company, among many other clients. So we can count WordPress creator Matt Mullenweg and NetSuite CEO Zach Nelson as possibilities. She also formerly counted Zynga, run by CEO Mark Pincus, and social network maker Ning, cofounded by Marc Andreessen, on Brew's roster.

We can only imagine a Zynga game spun from Whedon's superlative imagination.

Hammerling, who made Business Insider's PR 50 list of influential tech communicators, is also known for her personal friendships with Valley moguls like Oracle CEO Larry Ellison and Roger McNamee of Elevation Partners.

It wouldn't surprise us if any of these guys dropped $20,000 for lunch with Whedon, frankly.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/businessinsider/~3/963-Z5eTv9I/silicon-valley-geek-lunch-joss-whedon-2012-7

debt counseling corp debt definition debt dispute letter debt elimination calculator

Greek Debt Crisis Fix May Cost Central Banks up to 100 Billion Euros

-->

By Jan Strupczewski, John O'Donnell and Luke Baker

BRUSSELS -- European policymakers are working on "last chance" options to bring Greece's debts down and keep it in the euro zone, with the ECB and national central banks looking at taking significant losses on the value of their bond holdings, officials said.

Private creditors have already suffered big writedowns on their Greek bonds under a second bailout for Athens sealed in February, but this was not enough to put the country back on the path to solvency and a further restructuring is on the cards.

The latest aim is to reduce Greece's debts by a further 70 billion to 100 billion euros, several senior euro zone officials familiar with the discussions told Reuters, cutting its debts to a more manageable 100 percent of annual economic output.

This would require the European Central Bank and national central banks to take losses on their holdings of Greek government bonds, and could also involve national governments also accepting losses.

The favoured option is for the ECB and national central banks to carry the cost, but that could mean that some banks and the ECB itself having to be recapitalised, the officials said.

The ECB declined comment on Friday.

Planning is in the early stages and no formal discussions have yet taken place. But there is an awareness that Greece is way off-track in improving its finances and that aggressive action is needed to keep the country inside the euro zone.

Officials described a further restructuring of Greek debt as a last chance to restore the country to solvency, with the agreed goal of cutting its debt to 120 percent of GDP by 2020 already seen as far beyond reach.

The International Monetary Fund, a party to the two rescue packages Greece has so far received, is in favour of overhauling Athens's official-sector loans -- a process policymakers refer to as "OSI" or official-sector involvement.

"If I were to assign a percentage chance to OSI in Greece happening, I would say 70 percent," one euro zone official involved in the deliberations told Reuters.

30 Percent Option

One of the options being worked on would involve the ECB and national central banks in the Eurosystem writing down the value of the Greek government bonds they hold by 30 percent, under a process that bankers refer to as a "haircut."

Total outstanding official-sector credits to Greece, which also includes bilateral loans extended to Greece by eurozone governments, is about 220-230 billion euros.

A 30 percent writedown would therefore amount to slightly more than 70 billion euros, one official said. Another put the figure at between 70 and 100 billion euros, depending on how the process is carried out.

"It is very complicated and the precise method has not been decided yet because it is very early days," one source said.

Officials considered writing down the value of official-sector loans to Greece last year when they were putting together the second EU/IMF rescue program, which focused on the restructuring of Greece's private-sector debt.

But OSI was deemed too politically sensitive at the time and was pushed into the background. One official described that as a missed opportunity and suggested it should not be repeated.

"The big mistake was that we didn't manage to haircut the Greek government bonds that were in the investment portfolios of the national central banks. That was really, really stupid," the official told Reuters.

Central Bank Recapitalization

Politically, it may be easier for policymakers to get the ECB and national central banks to take a hit on their bond holdings, rather than euro zone governments which would mean that taxpayers suffered direct losses.

However, the process would still come with complications. First of all, several national central banks would probably have to be recapitalised, officials said.

Two officials indicated that the French, Maltese and Cypriot central banks were most exposed to Greek government debt and would probably need a capital injection. Two other officials said the ECB could also need balance sheet support.

"The preference is that the OSI would happen on ECB books," one of the sources said. "The ECB would have to be recapitalised as a result, but that would be politically much more acceptable than a loss for taxpayers."

Another of the sources said that while the ECB held reserves to cover such writedowns, a restructuring of Greece's debt could require "action to protect the balance sheet further".

Asked about the exposure of specific national central banks to Greece, one of the four officials Reuters spoke to said: "France has a huge amount. Very large."

Asked whether that would not mean a recapitalisation of some central banks, he replied: "Yes, but so what?"

The Cypriot and Maltese central banks did not immediately respond to queries. The Bank of France referred calls to the ECB.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin Wordpress | Android Forums | Wordpress Tutorials

Source: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/07/27/greek-debt-crisis-european-central-bank-haircut/

consolidation debt loan payday consumer debt advocate consumer debt collection consumer debt relief

Should You Consolidate Debt With 0% Balance Transfer Credit Card Offers?

Consolidation Loans For People with Bad Credit With the new CARD act, a lot of card companies started to change their business models which helped in making zero percent credit card balance transfers a very rare commodity according to the wall street journal. But there are still a few and when properly executed, they can [...]

The post Should You Consolidate Debt With 0% Balance Transfer Credit Card Offers? appeared first on legal debt help online.

Source: http://www.legaldebthelponline.com/2012/06/28/should-you-consolidate-debt-with-0-balance-transfer-credit-card-offers/

negotiating credit card debt non profit debt help non profit debt management north carolina debt consolidation