What Is A "Heat Dome"?


Heat dome

The heat dome that's been baking most of the country this week is now clamped firmly over the eastern U.S.

The "dome" is actually a large high pressure a system with hot temperatures pushing down on especially moist air, close to the ground.

Eli Jacks of the National Weather Service (NWS), tells the Associated Press that when combined with cloudless skies, and the sun's higher summertime angle, the effect is what we've seen this week.

It's the combined effect of the tilt of the earth toward the sun and the lack of rain that forces the ground air to sink, compress, and heat up to what we see now.

Temperatures have been in the 90s and 100s throughout the lower 48 states with the heat index making that feel like it's up to 110 to 120 degrees.

This isn't as big a deal in the southern parts of the country. People in Texas and Arizona are used to high temperatures, people in Minnesota less so and often have no air conditioning or experience with taking precautions.

And the northern states are suffering right along with everyone else as the heat dome also nudges the jet stream's dry, cool air, farther north and into Canada.

All this while the hot, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico swirls around the dome traveling farther from the sea than it otherwise would.

At the perimeter of the dome lies the "ring of fire" where thunderstorms will flare up and bring temporary relief, but Kevin Birk of the NWS says this dome is so large that the heat is rebuilding very quickly.

Lasting up to 10 days in some areas, the size and duration of this heat dome is uncommon and already 22 people have died.

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/businessinsider/~3/UdMig2i666Y/heat-dome-eastern-united-states-2011-7

pay off debt fast sample debt collection letter sample debt settlement letter settling credit card debt

Debt Consolidation Loan Problems

[WizardRSS: unable to retrieve full-text content]

Debt Consolidation might be what you are searching for. Debt consolidation was invented to get you out of stressful debt. Debt consolidators will reduce your stress, your expenses and even better your credit score.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://ezinearticles.com/6420544

debt advisor debt arbitration debt clearance debt collection agencies uk

Understanding Debt Relief

[WizardRSS: unable to retrieve full-text content]

Orlando, Fl -- Let's face it, debt repayments are a major component of every household budget, whether it be for the repayment of a mortgage loan, car loan, or credit cards. Every month consumers are faced with the reality that they owe someone (or someplace) money, and they factor those payments into their budget. The majority of these debts carry very long repayment timelines and often consumers can find themselves at a point in their life where their income is not sufficient to maintain the repayment terms of their debts (for the purposes of this article we are referring specifically to unsecured debts- credit cards, signature loans, store cards, gas cards, etc.).

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://ezinearticles.com/6408467

debt rescue debt resolve debt settlement advice debt settlement agency

The 30-Year Amortizing Mortgage is a Win-Win (Part 1 of a Series)


Even the normally level-headed Buce?who knows better and lets us know he knows better?tries to give Tyler Cowen?s broadside at Fannie and Freddie the benefit of some (contrived) doubt.  I?ve already screamed about the legerdemain of Cowen?s post elsewhere, so let?s go for the philosophical underpinnings.

Let?s give some ground first.  Buce is spot-on with:

One is the question whether Fannie/Freddie misbehaved in the years leading up to the pop.  On that point, I don't think anybody can quarrel that Fannie (at least) has an appalling record of institutional misbehavior: rapacious and corrupt and willing to do whatever it could to pervert the lawful structure of good government--in short, they behaved like a money center bank. [emphasis mine]

I can and will quarrel that it depends on how you define ?misbehaved.?  As Bakho notes chez DeLong:

Freddie/Fannie responded to the housing bubble once they started losing market share. The pressure on the private F/F was to regain market share.

Would a fully public F/F be under the same pressure to increase market share? No. The pressure would have been for a public institution to not compete with the private sector and only write those loans the private sector was unwilling to write.

Again, I?ll quibble that last sentence?it should read ?loans the private sector could not make profitably,? but that?s part of the argument below and generally the phrases should mean the same. But if you believe the risk is being managed properly by the money center and investment banks, there?s no reason ex ante to believe that Fannie and Freddie misbehaved.  The ?non-conforming? products all fill a consumer need, though some have very limited markets that are truly appropriate.

Balloon mortgages, floating-rate mortgages with (and without) long-term caps,  or even IO mortgages make sense for a small subset of people. For balloon mortgages, think people who receive regular, annual bonuses.  The second is a yield-curve play for the borrower: either the upfront cost of the cap charged to the borrower gives the bank a cushion or the risk of high rates remains with the borrower. (The latter is a bad idea for anyone at risk of being liquidity-constrained.) The third is more difficult to justify?partially because it should carry a higher interest rate?but might be appropriate for second-home mortgages and the like.

Even I won?t try to defend negative-amortization purchase loans. Any bank or firm that believed?and certainly those that still believe?that such a product has any reason to exist should be closed with prejudice, since its managers and directors clearly have no clue how to run a mortgage-related business.

(Exception noted: reverse mortgages are philosophically reasonable, though I personally don?t believe they are either reasonable or valuable as they are currently sold, especially if you consider all of the non-economic reasons. But reverse mortgages do not have the same risk profile for the bank that reverse-amortization loans do, so the argument is more over demand than supply.)

So there might be a market for all of the products that got headlines in the early and mid-Noughts. The problem is that?even with the size of the U.S. housing market?those niche products are likely to be unprofitable, given the fixed costs, reporting requirements, and back-office operations needed to manage and evaluate the products.

To no one?s great surprise (I trust), the first thing that went was conformance to those reporting and management requirements.

But that still wasn?t enough, especially in the case of the Bubble, so people who might have survived bullet loans or even amortizing floaters with or without caps ended up getting, er, encouraged to take loans that had a worse profile for them.  Buce carps:

[The GSEs] were willing to make the right noises about serving  public purpose but at the end of the day they had no more interest in the larger public good than Stan O'Neal, Dick Fuld or Jimmie Cayne.

That may have been true at the top?my view of Daniel ?acts like Harry? Mudd?s guidance of Fannie is no secret?but the risk controls at Fannie were far superior to the controls Jimmy Cayne enabled. Don?t believe me?  Ask Paul Friedman:

"It took two or three weeks to mark," explained Friedman. "It literally took a dozen people on the mortgage desk night and day, and a bunch of our research people night and day and weekends, three weeks to value this stuff, which tells you just how illiquid it was."

By the time they did figure out what most of it was worth, the firm had miscalculated badly. "We thought there was $400 million-ish of cushion, and in fact, as it turned out, we missed by like $1 billion out of $1.5 billion," says Friedman. "It was not even close. You would think you could get it to the nearest billion, and a lot of it was the market deteriorating dramatically in that five or six weeks. But it was just a guess to begin with."

Don?t get me wrong: I consider this the equivalent of the Bancroft family getting all uppity about how Rupert ?ruined their brand? or whatever. Instead of paying for projects and systems that could do that work, Bear upper management?not excluding Paul Friedman?took the cash home every year and budgeted their IT department(s) for the next year. The man who controls the purse strings and prioritization complaining about the system inadequacies may well be the 21st century equivalent of the obligatory teen who kills both her parents and pleads for mercy because she?s an orphan.

But, taking Paul Friedman at his word, his systems couldn?t do in 2007 what Fannie Mae?s could do in 2001.  And if the risk cannot be evaluated properly, the price isn?t going to be right. Doesn?t mean it?s too high or too low, just that it?s not going to be right.

So when those ?bridge securitizations? (as it were)?mortgages purchased to securitize?become ?pier loans? because no one wants to buy the security, you better have priced the loan appropriately, because it?s all going on your books and against your capital.

From what I can tell, what made Bear?and very probably Lehmann?different from all others is that they had their own mortgage origination units.  So after all the other ?private label issuers? (read: non-GSEs) stopped buying mortgages for MBSes around Hallowe?en of 2006, Bear was still buying from its own pipeline for another two or three months.  (By February of 2007, even Bear wasn?t buying.)

Note therefore, that

And any economists can tell you what happens when Q(s) > Q(d).  But Buce has more fun:

Or, they wanted that until they didn?t want it, which is to say until they started pouring gasoline on a bonfire.

I suspect that?s not exactly true.  Looking at the flows, it appears more that the Mudd Dynasty (and a poke or two from the Bush Administration) resulted in the GSEs being basically the only Origination game in town??extend and pretend? started early.  As I* have often noted, by August of 2007, both Lehmann and Bear were issuing debt?and, with due respects to Felix (and Robert multiple times etc.)?the market (as I have noted before) knew that all was not well and any investor who was truly ?rational? was paying attention to spreads.  (The rest were running ?money market funds.?*)

So if you want to argue that the GSEs extended the crisis, you?ll get no argument from me (so long as you note that, even there, they had help from the Administration and its allies).

So where am I quibbling?  Try here:

I do think that defenders of Fannie/Freddie get a bit ahead of their skis sometimes, and I suspect the reason is that they fear for the institutions per se; the defenders  see their enemies as wanting to put Fannie/Freddie out of business and they don't want Fannie/Freddie to go.  Me, I'm still on the fence on that issue.  It's not obvious to me that we need  government-sponsored mortgage market makers.  I can see you don't want to terminate tonight--or there would be no lending at all.  But schedule departure for five, ten years down the road, could be a good idea.

Uh, ?our enemies? do want ?to put Fannie/Freddie out of business.? They have said so. So the quibble is whether it is ?obvious we need  government-sponsored mortgage market makers.? And the evidence of that?remember the past, live the present?is clear that we do.

But that?s the next post.

 

*Only someone as deliberately clueless as Tim Geithner acts, or an economist, could believe that just because something calls itself a ?money market fund? means it cannot ?break the buck.? The number of the Deliberately Clueless has been expanding in recent months.

Read more posts on Angry Bear »

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/businessinsider/~3/ewZhh5l_dWw/the-30-year-amortizing-mortgage-is-a-win-win-part-1-of-a-series-2011-7

american debt settlement american debt solutions bad debt collection bad debt mortgage

Is Employing A DUI Attorney Essential?

DUI defense lawyers Phoenix Driving beneath the affect (DUI) is a significant crime which is seen in every single nation in the entire world. The penalties, yet, deviate from region to area. The crime of DUI defense lawyers Tempe are committed by driving a motor auto below the influence of alcohol or medications. For a [...]

Source: http://www.legaldebthelponline.com/2011/07/22/is-employing-a-dui-attorney-essential/

erase credit card debt family credit counseling federal debt consolidation freedom debt relief scam

WATCH: Stephen Colbert's Completely Serious Anti-Bullying Video

Immigration To Canada And The Right To Work Visa: How It Works

Among the best destinations for migrant workers at this present time is Canada. Aided by the booming economy of this country and the great improvements with the standard of living, Canada has a serious need for foreign workers to fill certain positions. Meanwhile, there is no legal option for a foreigner to live and be [...]

Source: http://www.legaldebthelponline.com/2011/07/20/immigration-to-canada-and-the-right-to-work-visa-how-it-works/

stop debt collectors student loan debt relief texas debt collection act uk government debt

When Stewardship Isn't A Priority

Nearly a decade ago, Patrick Johnson was serving as the treasurer at his church when he felt God distinctly tell him: I want you to preach on money. ?I?d never preached on money before, that?s for sure.?

His pastor thought it was a great idea, so in preparation, Patrick read a book called The Treasure Principle. It gave him a whole new perspective on the connection between generosity, grace and one?s spiritual life as a Christian.

Soon, it went from preaching a sermon to realizing that it was his calling in life to teach people what biblical stewardship looks like. God opened the door for him to travel the country with Ron Blue and the Christian Financial Planning Network, and he was then invited to come on board at an organization called Generous Giving.

The organization asked him to develop a strategy to get the church involved in generosity in a whole new way, and he recalls saying, ?That couldn?t be too hard??

?Those were my famous last words,? he laughed.

Patrick has always believed that if we are going to see a revolution of generosity in this nation, we need the church involved.

So, he left his job and came on board with Generous Giving. For the first two years, he simply traveled the country visiting innovative churches and seeing what they were doing in the area of stewardship, connecting churches to each other where he saw needs.

Two years later, he continued networking by forming a Generous Church Leader community as part of the National Christian Foundation.

It came about as an answer to his question: What?s the best way to influence the church? Leadership. ?The culture of the church reflects the life of the leaders,? he said. ?I reach out to the pastor, key staff, and key lay leaders. Once those three align, good things happen in the church.?

Why The Issue Gets Ignored

Stewardship and generosity are not interchangeable, but true, biblical stewardship inevitably leads to generosity. Yet, many church leaders don?t give either issue much attention.

From Patrick?s experience, there are typically three reasons that pastors don?t make stewardship training a priority:

1. Fear: Patrick doesn?t find that many of the pastors he works with are greedy. They?re good men with a heart for the kingdom who aren?t out to get rich. Yet, so many of them are fearful of being perceived like the prosperity preachers on TV. They don?t want to be misunderstood. They think, If we address this issue of money, people are going to doubt our motives. ?But that?s ridiculous if you think about it,? Patrick said. ?Most pastors I know sacrificed a lot of time, talent and treasure to get their church going in the first place.?

2. They just don?t think about it: ?I found out that there are a lot of generous pastors?who are far more generous than I am?but it?s very few pastors? passion.? They are usually more focused on things like evangelism and discipleship. ?They don?t wake up thinking about it all the time, so they don?t think to preach about it.?

3. They don?t see the need: Patrick has noticed that many pastors simply don?t have eyes to see the need for stewardship training. So many times at events he has watched them make the connection between stewardship, generosity and discipleship for the first time. ?When these three things come together, they see this is not about raising more money for the church? this is about the life of the disciple. This is about the kingdom of God. Once you see it for the first time, then you see it all in Scripture. You see it everywhere.?

Patrick sees great value in having a pastor and ministry focused on stewardship?but under one condition: that it?s not ?silo-ed.?

?I think a trap that a lot of churches fall into is that they hire a stewardship pastor to come in and do some great things, but if it?s not integrated across the church, it becomes silo-ed, and my experience has been that even at large churches you?re only reaching a small group of people. ?

Yet, many churches are making biblical stewardship a part of their DNA. Pastors and leaders are awakening to the need and watching amazing things happen as they financially disciple the congregation. Dave Ramsey has created a program called Momentum to lock arms with churches that want to do just that. Momentum is all about bringing people back to God?s view of money management and cultivating a culture of lasting generosity. Discover today how Momentum can help your congregation.

More About Patrick Johnson

How generous is your church? It?s not an easy question to answer, but Patrick Johnson, Senior Vice President at National Christian Foundation, has helped churches all over the country do it with something they call the Generosity Diagnostic. You can learn more about it at nationalchristian.com. Patrick also shares a helpful look at five attributes of a generous church in this video.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://www.daveramsey.com/article/when-stewardship-isnt-a-priority/lifeandmoney_church

bad debt mortgage bad debt write off bankruptcy debt relief best debt consolidation company

Hiring An Immigration Lawyer: Know What To Ask

Hiring an immigration lawyer is really a key step to receiving a successful resolution to your application for immigration to another country. Immigration lawyers have different fields of knowledge and not every one could possibly be the right choice for your case. By asking the proper questions, you will be able to ascertain which lawyer [...]

Source: http://www.legaldebthelponline.com/2011/07/19/hiring-an-immigration-lawyer-know-what-to-ask/

debt consolidation agency debt consolidation blog debt consolidation canada debt consolidation florida